Feb 19

It’s the Details, Stupid

I was visiting my mother who was in the hospital recently.  While hospitals exist to heal, I know they can be very dangerous places.  An incident during this stay did not ease my fears.  And it didn’t even involve my mother.

I had stepped outside of her room and was standing in the hallway passing time.  There happened to be a bulletin board in the hallway—it is hard to believe that in this day of email, texting and tweeting, bulletin boards are still used as a means of communicating, but they are.

There was a very nice looking poster on this bulletin board that caught my attention.  It was a call for nominations for employees and doctors who reflect the highest ideals of the institution.  The award was named after the founder of the institution.  Done well, these kinds of recognition can remind employees of the ideals on which the organization was founded, but done poorly they can be a disaster.

I read the traits of the people that they were looking to recognize.  Then, as I continued to read, I was struck by a frightening reminder about quality and safety in hospitals.  No, the poster wasn’t dangerous.  It wasn’t even what it said—it was the date on the poster.  This was a poster for the 2009 award!  The deadline for submission of nominations was February 2010, two years earlier.

Now that may not seem so frightening to you, but to me it raises the question, “If their management and operating systems are so bad that they can’t keep a posters on a bulletin board up to date, how timely are they performing clinical procedures, and how accurately are they administering meds?”

I am not sure who said it first, but the adage that came to my mind was, “The cleanliness of the dropdown trays on an airplane tells you a lot about how well they do engine maintenance.”  Or, perhaps another way of saying it is, “It is the details, stupid.”

Great execution and great quality do not come by accident in organizations.  Now I know some of us are obsessive compulsive and detailed oriented.  But that is not what quality that produces great hospitals and great airlines is about.  It is about an intentional design of quality into every single aspect of how the organization functions.  It is about an attitude and culture that is focused on meeting customer needs and continual improvement in meeting those needs.  But it is about a lot more than attitude.  It is about measurement and feedback and systems that enable improvement every single day.

The details really are not the point.  The drop down trays are not the point.  The bulletin board is not the point.  They are simply indicators of how well we are doing on the real point!

Posted by philgibbs

Share this post

ShareThis

Filed under Organization

Tagged with: Tags: ,

User Comments

Mike Costa - 2012-02-22 13:47:29

Very nice observation. I have seen the same many times. It aslo made me wonder if anyone was worth recognizing during the past two years.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Feb 5

Landing Versus Nesting

One thing that we can be sure of in the virtual world of work is that “place” is still important.  Few of us are very good at being totally virtual.

Toward the end of last year Josh Bowling and I attended a conference on mobile work in San Francisco.  It was held at a conference center on the campus of the University of California San Francisco.  And it was a great conference extolling the virtues of technologies that allow us to be mobile and work virtually.

As I was exploring the conference center, I came upon a visual image that challenged my mobile paradigm.  The conference center was in a building next to an academic building with what I assume were professors’ offices.  The offices had large windows and the lights were on.  I was able to see clearly and what I saw were not offices, but nests.  Yes, NESTS!  You have seen them–papers stacked everywhere.  Hardly room to walk or find a place to sit.  It may remind you of your professor’s office, or perhaps your own office.  The NEST is certainly not limited to the academic world.

I am not an anthropologist, but it made me wonder how ingrained in our genes and psyche is the need to NEST.  Is it just a workplace thing?  Do we build NESTS at home and at work?  Do the forms that the NESTS take give us insights into who the person is?

But the real question that stared me in the face was how do we NEST in a paperless, mobile, virtual world?  Will this need derail the building momentum toward what seems like a much more appealing way of working.

As someone having a lot riding on developing world-class places for mobile workers to LAND, but not NEST, you can imagine this was a disconcerting moment.  So what are the implications of the seemingly pervasive need to NEST—although some people obviously have more serious cases than others—for the mobile workforce?

Having caught my breath, I would argue as I stated in the opening that “place” is still important in a virtual world.  Being totally virtual just doesn’t work.  Think about it.  Most people who work virtually celebrate the fact that they can go around and meet in their clients’ or other people’s offices.  But if everyone is virtual, then there are NO offices to meet in—gotcha!

Physical place is still important.  It may be a coffee shop or a place specifically designed for mobile workers like E|SPACES.  But how do you satisfy the need to NEST in a place that is designed for LANDING?  Perhaps it is a design that creates defined spaces and a cozy, safe feeling even in an open environment.  Perhaps when a person finds exactly the right environment, they build today’s NEST on their desktops and displays.  And an advantage is they can take their NEST with them to the next PLACE they LAND.

Maybe those professor’s offices were not as chaotic as they appeared. OK, I confess.  Sometimes I too work in environments like those and I sort of know where things are.  Maybe it is not the chaos, or the NEST, but the familiarity.  If that is the case, I can create familiarity with apps, icons and electronic folders just as I can with stacks of books, binders and papers.  Come to think of it, my files in the Cloud are in about as much disorder as my paper files.  The difference is that the search functions allow me to find what I need much faster.

So what are your thoughts?  How can we satisfy this need to NEST in today’s mobile, virtual world of work?

Posted by philgibbs

Share this post

ShareThis

Filed under Organization

Tagged with: Tags: , , ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Jun 28

What Happened to the Office?

Sometimes change moves at a sloooow pace. Sometimes it starts slowly and then accelerates. And then it feels like the change happened overnight–at warp speed. You know, like the recording artist who experiences overnight success after singing in dives for 20 years.

I get the feeling that is what is happening with how we work. All of a sudden there is a massive wave of change. Now it seems like everyone—entrepreneurs, small businesses, and corporate warriors–has become a mobile worker. Armed with smart phones, tablets and laptops, they are working from home, coffee shops, cars, hotel lobbies and wherever they can find.

So what happened to the office? Do people still use them? Are they rapidly becoming relics like the typewriter that used to sit in the office, or the fax machine for that matter? The term “office” is ingrained in our language—“I’ve got to go to the office.” However, in many organizations, the office serves little practical use. In fact we talk about “going to the office” because we are rarely there. Don’t believe it—just do a quick check of virtually any building and you will see how many offices sit empty most of the time. The cynic might say the only real use for the office is to tell where the occupant fits in the hierarchy.

So, how is the change working out? Have the newly mobile workers found places that function well for getting work done and meeting with colleagues and clients? The home office works well for some things but not for meeting with clients, and often there are interruptions—like the dog barking during an important call. The casual environment and energy of coffee shops can be appealing, but they are often crowded and loud.

For an analysis of “third place” options, check out Andrea Pirrotti’s blog post starting with, surely not, McDonalds. McDonalds: the next great 3rd Place. Hmm…

A lot is being written about where we are beginning to work and live. One of the most intriguing examples is an excerpt from the book Aerotropolis, published in the June Southwest Airlines Spirit magazine. In this article, the search for the new place to work moves to the “fourth place.” The Corporate Latter

The change is happening so fast, some of us didn’t even know we had the option of a “third place,” much less a “fourth place.”

Posted by philgibbs

Share this post

ShareThis

Filed under Organization

Tagged with: Tags: , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Mar 7

Paper Files and Drive Time

Recently I was sitting at a table at a marriage seminar and overheard a conversation about commuting to work and mass transit—definitely on topic.  The obvious response, or perhaps I should say reaction, to any discussion about commuting goes something like, “Don’t get me started—I hate creeping along at two miles per hour every single morning and afternoon. We have to build more roads!”

When I bother to engage my brain, however, I am not sure the obvious response is the correct response. At least I am not sure it is the response that addresses the fundamental issue.

Often we are so immersed in a system that we do not see what is really going on. Morning and afternoon traffic jams are just assumed.  When I had an office on the 29th floor of a downtown tower, I used to watch traffic build and slow to a crawl every afternoon–ok, so I wasn’t there early enough to see it in the morning.  We have HOV lanes on interstates that limit use during mornings and afternoons.  A popular movie a few years ago was titled “Nine to Five”.  Our company recently ran an ad on radio–public radio for that matter–during “drive time”.  Morning and afternoon traffic jams are so ingrained in our psyche that they are simply a given—kind of like Jell-O is a salad, macaroni and cheese a vegetable, and in the south, Pepsi is a Coke–now I am definitely off topic.

So when the brain is engaged, the question that must be asked before increasing the number of lanes or building rail or adding people movers, is why are all the vehicles on the road at the same time?  The answer is of course simple–that is when people go to work and get off work.  Now I understand.  But why does everyone go to and get off work at the same time?

Actually, years ago in a manufacturing based economy and a face-to-face communication and transaction environment, it did make sense.  People needed to come together in the same place at the same time to accomplish work.  Roads and transit systems were built to accommodate those needs.

But now we are primarily a service and mediated communication economy.  Research by IDC shows that by 2013, 75.5% of the workforce will be mobile.  That means we can work from anywhere, any time.  That means we are not tied to an 8:00 to 5:00 schedule. It also means we can work from home, coffee shops and 24/7 work and meeting spaces like E|SPACES.

So, if we fast forward ten or twenty years, I wonder if we will look back and talk about morning and evening traffic jams and “drive time,” like we talk about eight tracks, brick cell phones, punch cards and paper files.

We should not underestimate the impact of the mobile workforce on virtually every aspect of our lives–from where we live, to the types of organizations we work in, to commercial real estate, and especially to drive time and traffic jams.  As we contemplate solutions and huge investments, we must address the fundamental issues and the future, not a dated past.

Posted by philgibbs

Share this post

ShareThis

Filed under Organization

Tagged with:

User Comments

stephanie smith - 2011-04-04 15:14:31

I am trying to get in touch with phil gibbs. Love your concept!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Aug 31

Un-Boxing the Office

Why do the majority of professionals, managers and executives still work in boxes? Oh yea, we call them “offices”, but they are basically boxes. And yes, the top has been cut out of some and we call them cubicles, but a box is a box.

The fact that this form of office still exists today is testament to our amazing ability to resist change. I am reminded of a statement by the principal at one of my children’s schools a few years ago. He said the reason school classrooms were the same size they have been for years is because that is the size they cut logs when building one-room schoolhouses.

How ridiculous! Schools are so backwards. They are not on the cutting edge like business and industry. Just look at our supply chain technology, mass customization, process management and sophisticated CRM systems. But, maybe we need to take a close look at the places where we work.

If the basic form of the office is a box, we have to ask the question—does it still serve the function it once served? Or more poignant, does it makes sense to sit in a box to do work today? Perhaps in the past it did. There were several factors that caused us to embrace the box as an office—a place to do work.

  • · Organizations were characterized by hierarchy and employees’ value was defined by where they fit in the hierarchy. The person’s “office” was the clearest symbol of hierarchical position. The first hurdle was just getting an office, then a larger office, and then of course the coveted corner office. But it didn’t stop there, an office on a higher floor obviously meant a higher position. How could we have known where a person fit in the hierarchy without the office?
  • · Once a person had an office, the next challenge in proving their worth was what they put on the walls. And you have to have a box to have walls. First of course were the degrees—the more the better. Then the certificates and recognitions. And of course the pictures with important people. Oops, and don’t forget the pics of the family, although usually they were on the desk close to where the person sat—come on, lighten up, most of us have been there.
  • · Next, they need their stuff, particularly files. Some were in file cabinets but many were in stacks that weren’t filed and would never be filed, much less found. In fact some people created multiple stacks of files that weren’t filed so they could feel at least somewhat organized. But the point wasn’t to find them, but to demonstrate to those who came into their box that they were busy and were doing lots of work, which is what you are supposed to do in a box.
  • · And then there was the need for private meetings. They would schedule meetings with their boss, who had a larger box, and then individual meetings with the people who reported to them, who of course had smaller boxes. They had to communicate clearly and sometimes confidentially. They certainly didn’t want someone else to know what they were doing. After all people with smaller boxes were always looking for ways to take someone’s larger box.
  • · I almost forgot the name on the door of the box. That was really important–particularly important when they were out of the office for a week or two, so that others would not forget them. And of course they needed a place for the mail to be stacked so they would feel important when they got back to the office.

OK, I got carried away. Or did I? Organizations that continue to function like this simply will not survive in today’s environment. Form should follow function and organizations that thrive today do not function even remotely like this.

A few years ago we were talking about the demise of middle management. As computers became ubiquitous, the need for middle managers, whose job was primarily to communicate with other managers, fairly quickly became antiquated.

Today, the discussion is not about middle management, but about the whole organization as we know it. Now, as mobile, smart communication devices become ubiquitous, the concept of the organization is beginning to change, and change rapidly. The need for people to be in one place to transact business is history. Organizational boundaries are blurred—it is almost impossible to know who is an employee or contractor or vendor or consultant. Multiple small organizations and individuals may come together for short periods to accomplish big projects.

The hierarchy is being replaced by a fluid, organic structure driven by the task at hand. Value to the organization is based on contribution to the task, not position in a hierarchy—if there were a hierarchy. Work and life are no longer dichotomies. Rather, we are able to work anywhere, anytime that the task requires. Instead of work interfering with vacation, we can go on vacation to work.

OK, maybe that is a stretch. But the point is that the concept of work and organization is fundamentally changing. If the function is changing, the form also must change—a box is no longer a form that serves us well.

So what is the form of the next generation office that matches the new way we organize and work?

  • · The new “office” is not a box. Rather, it should have an open, comfortable and inviting design. It should be a place people want to go, not a place they feel like they have to go to “work”. What is this, a resort? Wouldn’t b e a bad place to work, would it?
  • · The office should have multiple spaces designed to meet the task at hand. That may mean a casual chair with a tablet arm, a café table for two, a lounge chair on an open balcony or a private meeting room for ten, with video conference technology for connecting six more around the world.
  • · The spaces should be shared by multiple users. Managers and professionals are on the move. Their traditional boxes with their names on the door generally sit empty much of the time—they are traveling, in meetings, on vacation or at a coffee shop. What a waste of energy and resources, not to mention construction costs. The new concept office may be the ultimate green initiative.
  • · It should be technology rich. People carry most of their technology with them, but they still need group video conferencing technology, high-speed wireless internet, access to electrical power and occasionally access to paper copying and printing. Rather than paper file cabinets, the new office should provide easy access to electronic filing—the type that doesn’t take up space and files can be searched and actually found. And yes, the pictures of the family can go on the screen saver.
  • · The new office must be a place. The temptation is to think virtual. Yes, technologically we are capable of working from any where, any time. Sounds good but place and community are still important. We have tried virtual at the extremes and it leads to cyber insanity—need I only say FarmVille! The new office can be labeled “post virtual”. Yes it supports virtual work and virtual organizations, but it provides both physical place and human community.

Welcome to the office of the future, except the future is now. The new way of functioning is certainly here, while the new form of office is just beginning to emerge. Next generation offices like E|SPACES in the Hill Center at Belle Meade provide a stark contrast to the office as a box and a glimpse of what is coming. When form and function merge, the outcome is a thing of beauty.

Posted by philgibbs

Share this post

ShareThis

Filed under Organization

Tagged with: Tags: ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>